From franchise opportunity
to a structured investment decision.
A prospective investor was considering whether to commit capital and take on the operational responsibility of running an established fast-food franchise. Before making the decision, the opportunity was assessed across historical store performance, location, competition, franchise terms, investment requirements and different operating scenarios. The objective was to replace intuition with a structured commercial basis for the investment decision.
Based on advisory work delivered by SR Konsul's founder.
The challenge
An established franchise can reduce some of the uncertainty associated with starting a business from scratch, but a recognised brand does not automatically make an individual franchise opportunity attractive.
The investor needed to understand whether the specific opportunity could support a viable business after considering the investment required, franchise obligations, operating costs, staffing needs, competitive environment and realistic revenue potential.
Location was particularly important. The assessment therefore also needed to consider the proposed area and what the history of other businesses and concepts in the area could indicate about demand and commercial potential.
The challenge was to bring these factors together into one coherent investment case and identify which assumptions had the greatest influence on whether the opportunity made financial and operational sense.
The approach
The assessment began with the economics of the franchise model. Historical financial performance from existing locations was reviewed to understand how the concept had performed in practice rather than relying only on brand expectations or headline projections.
The proposed location was then assessed in the context of the surrounding market. The history of other businesses and concepts in the area was considered alongside the competitive landscape to build a more realistic view of local demand and commercial potential.
The franchise terms, required investment and operational model were reviewed together with staffing requirements and break-even considerations. Expected revenue was modelled using different scenarios and assumptions rather than relying on a single forecast.
This created a base case, stronger scenarios and downside considerations that made it possible to test which assumptions had the greatest effect on the investment case.
The different elements were ultimately brought together into a commercial assessment covering expected upside, financial exposure, operational responsibility and key risks. Based on the overall case, the recommendation was to proceed with the investment.
The impact
The investor proceeded with the franchise after the assessment and recommendation and has now operated the business for approximately one year.
The value of the work was not simply the final yes-or-no recommendation. The assessment made the underlying assumptions visible and showed how changes in revenue, staffing, costs and other key factors could affect the investment case.
This gave the investor a clearer understanding of both the opportunity and the risks before committing capital and taking on the operational responsibility of the franchise.
The subsequent operation also highlights an important distinction in advisory work: a strong investment analysis can improve the quality of the initial decision, but actual performance ultimately depends on execution, financing and changing market conditions after the investment is made.
The case reflects SR Konsul's approach to advisory work: structure uncertainty, test the assumptions that matter and turn the analysis into a clear recommendation.
Have a similar decision to make?
Tell us briefly what you are considering. We'll help structure the decision and determine the right next step.